Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. In lieu of treating it as a big intra-urban culture war, I am going to talk about best practices from the perspective of limiting revenue loss to a minimum. Ditto public urination; it exists in Berlin, but not in elevators Ive seen men do it at night on the side of the secondary entrance to the S-Bahn at Neuklln (which is more or less the poorest area inside the Ring), but the area smells fine, so I suspect that either its not common enough to be a public health hazard or theres regular cleaning. Find out more about the Single Justice Procedure and how to submit your plea. What is really the moral logic in giving discounts to people that travel far, frequently, and during peak (at least 1 and 3 which also are regressive) a benefit over people that travel less and shorter? The outcome is predictably polarization and is just as disastrous here as for any other dimension of US public services. Say a 25% discount on each trip after 20 trips, and a 50% discount after 35 trips. tfl fare evasion settle out of court. As far as I understand, in Japan it is common (maybe even law) that the employer pays for the passes of their employees. (The metro area mode shares are 43% and 30% respectively, but Ile-de-France has 240 annual rail trips per capita and Metro New York has about 100.). | france.fr The official website of France. I was worried he would bring the awful British views of public transit to the job, and sure enough, an extraordinary focus on fares and fare-evasion, increased policing and compliance, just couldnt be more wrong. My single ticket to Windermere cost about $A200; by comparison, I can travel from Sydneys Central Station to Bomaderry on NSWs South Coast (a three hour journey, as is Windermere from London) for $2.50 on my seniors Opal Card. It is $12.40 to go from Fremont to SFO (a 30 mile drive). ), especially if I had just come from Paris. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_Settlement_Plan. That doesnt make any sense. If the subsidy for bulk discounts and rush-hour trips could be used to make off-peak fares really low (say on average 1 dollar or less in NY), this would have great gains in overall transit usage, the efficiency of the system, and social equity. In terms even an econo-rationalist (rational plan, Martin Kolk ) should understand: it works best when it is nearly frictionless. A Monthly Travelcard for zones 1-4 (inner London) is 194.00 (US$243.87, 217.17) This was a great result and I could not be more grateful. And yet, I cant help but notice the parallels with left-wing moralism on this: sexual assault is a form of oppression, theft (even robbery sometimes) is righteous downward redistribution of wealth. It is clear that in contexts such as Tokyo, Singapore, Hong Kong, Seoul, or Taipei, that really are true transit cities, public acceptance for an efficient pricing structure is pretty high (though peak-fare hikes are less common). We should be moving toward ALL in-city transportation should being pre-paid annual passes. These are the exact opposite of your econometric analysis. Find out about prosecutions, court proceedings and how to get help with your case. The issue is how to get those who live in it to use transit for more of their travel. I imagine thats what New York was thinking? And incidentally I totally reject your repeated assertion that low fares, or flat fares, to the outer zones of big cities, encourages sprawl, because it does the opposite (it will encourage TOD around the stations) and is much more likely to entice them out of their cars. Oh, and the new companies will of course order the cheapest rolling stock they can find which will mean Chinese, which in turn will reduce the profitability and scale etc of Alstom and Siemens (which arent allowed to merge to effectively compete against the likes of even more massively state-subsidised China rail companies). And if occasional users see how much cheaper a monthly card is, they are more likely to think about adopting more regular transit use. Sorry, I think fare evasion is important. At the end of the day they are more affected by a shitty public environment than the wealthy who can retreat to their upper middle class bubbles and not have to deal with the antisocial. Whats really at play is a class war issue. Those university students that take the bus for a 1200 meter ride, do push up the price for low-income earners that maybe cannot afford a monthly pass. In Switzerland, where consolidated fares have been in existence for more than a century, there are regular passenger counts. The fare structure should then encourage long-term season passes, including annual passes, so that nearly all residents who take public transport have already paid. And thats before we get to lack of light-rail. But no other American city has that excuse. This is an issue where my main methodology for making recommendations for Americans looking at peer developed countries is especially useful. Its the nature of the mindset that believes it can avoid spending real money by improving efficiency (at someone elses expense/convenience, often far into the future) to think this way. I have an appeal against conviction for fare evasion by TFL tomorrow, do you have any advice? JT September (2017). I read that even Japan (an extreme case obviously) wants to blame Chinese immigrants for a rise in crime (linked to criminal syndicates, they claim) which may or may not be true but reveals the cultural attitude behind the phenomenon. Exactly. Theres something interesting going on with Chesa Boudins campaign: he wants to decriminalize quality-of-life crimes (okay) and deprioritize prosecuting theft and redirect resources to prosecuting sexual assault (prioritize violent crime) and train cops to be more responsive to victims. michaelrjames , youre rather confused. It is not like we are arguing about some fantasy scenarios, I am just saying that the West could adopt systems more similar to the East (where it evidently works very well). Let me grab my laptop and a beer from the hotel bar and Ill do a quickly summary of findings., Okay. Fare is split between the different agencies. Monthly passes indeed encourage transit use, but thats not wasteful. For smaller municipalities, transit should be free. Seattle recently abolished off-peak fares for one transit operator because occasional riders found the fare structure overly complex and it was dissuading usage. The German one is to make it easy to follow the law and then use enforcement to not make it so easy to break it. Merde! (LogOut/ Germany..Eberswalde.Berlin.1204%. I can only think you are British because this is the kind of logic by which they run their transit. Extra induced trips by a switch to 0 from 0.5 a trip, are of course relatively more often going to be new 0.8 km trips than 15 km long. This thread has been locked by the moderators of r/LegalAdviceUK. Occasionally there is political lobbying and we did have at least one trial at one station. How is this intuitive at all? Thats why there is lot talk of new ticketing options (3 or 4 day a week passes) but the future is some form of fare capping in cities at least. You meet an interrogation window that demands what time you want to travel, or they only show a single service (Ouigo etc). Americans who support immigration liberalization practically never listen when I try bringing up the liberal work visa, asylum, and naturalization policies of Germany or Sweden. Yes. But I think those differences have eroded by now. But Paris: [Wiki, 2017] Paris if flat fare so it doesnt matter and they can have more, unattended, exits far from the attended area. Even the Brits who have had to contend with such systems their entire life, get immensely irritated by it. Michal James, it is clear that you dont have any experience of very well run transit city, such as in East Asia, where rich and poor regularly alike use transit. to reduce road congestion for other road users (inc. other cars). Fare evasion is punished in court by a fine of up to 1,000. Change), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Why would a woman want to take a bus or train when she might have to watch somebody pee? (Both also have the worst inequality amongst the developed world so they need to cater to the low-SES workers.) Of course with a monthly or unlimited-travel card, one doesnt think about it at all. One or two fewer workdays does not change the logic much for a working person residing in a zero-car household. Transport forLondon and most of the other railprovidersusually write to an individual who they suspect of fare evasion, asking them to respond to the allegation. fremont hospital deaths; what happened to tropical tidbits; chris herren speaking fee; boracay braids cultural appropriation; tfl fare evasion settle out of court. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. Is that recent? Stores dont have gates. I am sure you are aware that there is a large perception bias about such things due to bias in reporting by media etc. And in general is entirely counterproductive. One could envision that stationing 1 officer / entry watching for fare evasion should bring that fare evasion down to nearly 0 regardless of types of gates, as well as put a significant dent at crime since anyone chased out of the system can quickly be apprehended. There isnt really much they can do except hand down fines. Compared to other major European countries, commuting costs take up a considerably larger amount of workers pay (Table 1). a longer trip across town to an Ikea store or whatever. And it does an appalling job. Get the Niigata/Sendai/Morioka/Aomori/Akita/Matsuyama right before complaining about the Senboku/Daigo/Iiiyama places where nobody lives and a railway which is a high-capacity system is increasingly a poor fit. Similar remnants to Roslagsbanan and Saltsjbanan do exist in Germany as well. Are you aware of the kind of thing they subjected Season Ticket holders to from the Home Counties? On most of our bus lines drivers check tickets on boarding, but we seem to be transitioning away from this as well. Contact [email protected] to see how we can assist you. I concur, and Ive used London, NYC, HK, Tokyo, Shanghai, Moscow, Beijing amongst mega-city metro systems. In contrast, the unlicensed churro vending is more a problem of city and state regulations making it too onerous to sell food, hence Jessica Ramoss proposal to lift the cap on food carts. If you need help in avoiding a criminal conviction contact us now on 0800 002 9705 for free advice. 70% of department 77 Seine-et-Marne) and has huge forests and national parks (eg. Much less a whole restaurant. Im not sure how much they were promoting free transit (I only browsed it) but their predominant conclusion about UK policy on fares and costs was solid. Paris is better, but not by much. WebAppearance, the Court will schedule a Settlement Conference to occur within ninety (90) days of the filing of the Notice of Limited Appearance. *Except in the actual immigrant nations of USA, Canada and Australia where crime rates are lower in immigrants! For the thousands working on an employment pass, youre out of luck. New York would transition to a large discount through holding the monthly fare constant and hiking the single-ride fare With the Paris flat-fare system and immense freedom of Carte Orange, and of course that in almost every single aspect the system outperformed LU and was cheaper. The absolute level is a fraction of the USs, but the overrepresentation of certain racial minorities manages to be somewhat worse than in the US. This split also had an effect on the policing of fare evasion, as checks used to be a LOT rarer on the S-Bahn than the U-Bahn or tram, and in my experience the inspectors also tended to be more lenient, letting people off with a warning if they had a passable excuse, which would never happen with the BVG inspectors. Punishing drivers for occasional trips relative frequent transit riders also seems like a both inefficient, and politically flawed way, of encouraging switching to transit. *Except in the actual immigrant nations of USA, Canada and Australia where crime rates are lower in immigrants! We are seeing more an more examples of clients being summoned to court over unpaid fares of as little as 1.50. In cases where longer term avoidance of fares in suspected, for example using someone elses reduced fare Oyster Card over a period of time, Transport for London (TFL) may want to interview you under caution. And it makes you feel that you own the city (or the IdF). Anyway: the breakeven point for a zone 1-3 ticket is 48: the monthly is 158.30 with a travelcard, the peak single fare is 3.30. The Anglosphere does a shockingly poor job on this. have been recorded, including against people with mental disability trying to validate their ticket with their disability discount count, with fare inspector questioning authenticity of the disabled passengers proof of disability, and MTR have defended these actions by saying they are allowed to use reasonable violence against those who suspected to have violated their bylaw. Because the casuals (or potential casuals) will be outraged. I think what we really want to do bundle an annual transit pass, annual bikeshare, street parking pass, plus a local tolls discount, airport access pass, etc into a vehicle registration fee. WebFare evasion from tfl which led to a court summoning. No doubt designed and enforced by genuine elites who never intend to use the Underground themselves, except for an annual photo-op. The public transport system provides a certain level of constant service and a monthly pass is a right to use this service. Thats a significant consideration for regions with large income disparities. Webpediag > Blog > Uncategorized > tfl fare evasion settle out of court. Of course it changes the math, especially since many people get to work from home every once in awhile. E.g. In France there are subsidies to suburban rail and buses, but the Mtro is most likely profitable by itself (the fares are barely lower than here, the operating costs are the same, passenger traffic density is a lot higher). The cap on permits and the insurance/rent expenses of operating them in a subway station are indeed something to note. Cheaper transit is promoting sprawl in both cases. Some people got so infuriated that they went and sat in the First Class carriages (!) 2) They think its cool The advice I received was always well thought through and was communicated promptly at every point. The next state government forced the city transit operators to simplify their systems and work together for the next contract . 1) BART has distance-based fares. Its only wasteful if people are taking unnecessary rush hour trips, but even with the pricing of Zurich or the outer fare zones in Stockholm, the monthly pass is mostly subsidizing off-peak trips, when theres spare capacity. application of binomial distribution in civil engineering eames replica lounge chair review eames replica lounge chair review Fare evasion rate on Hong Kongs open, non-gated, LRT system in year 2002-2005 was said to be only 0.4%, but there doesnt seems to be any more updated data. @borners The German-speaking world, as irrational as Britain and France about urban crime rates that are far lower than they were a generation ago, still treats the train and bus rider as a law-abiding customer unless proven otherwise. Anyway, the reason London doesnt have these is because of their nitpicking fare system: they need you to swipe out to calculate the fare. For commutes, especially the suburban crowd, transit is essentially free as to user, as its paid for by the employer, and the income is untaxed by the government. Incidentally, another difference between HK & Singapore is that they are quite low-tax places, whereas France (and most EU) are high personal tax countries; one thus has a mentality that my taxes partly paid for this so one can start to resent paying excessively to use it as well. To Posters (it is important you read this section), Tell us whether you're in England, Wales, Scotland, or NI as the laws in each are very different. I profoundly disagree. Different rail providers bring different charges under different laws depending on the circumstances. However Sydney had a horrendously complex British style system, and worse buses and ferries were different (and it was intended to integrate everything), and eventually they couldnt do it under the contract constraints (it was part of the reason they went bust). Sounds miserlyalmost Britishcompared to Paris. I guess the numbers on Wikipedia are old, but according to its list, neither BVG nor MVV break even on fares. In fact, the UKs disaster of rail privatisation saw much higher subsidy from central government than before privatisation! They are cited in the same way that a fare evader is, even though theyve obviously paid the fare. I think its also right thing to talk about the sum of the three: But lets not pretend were talking about the best means of revenue collection. Its probably one of the most American-friendly ways of encouraging more monthly distribution, since itd be hard to argue that employers shouldnt mitigate their employees commute impacts. We base such a policy on international examples wherein commuting costs are also born by employers, the state, or a combination of employer, state and commuter. My tickets were purchased six weeks in advance and were second class non-reserved and off-peak and this is supposed to be the cheapest option. 2019) (applying abuse-of-discretion standard to review the denial of a motion to amend to add a claim for punitive damages), review denied (Minn. Mar. New Yorks 46 is still similar, esp. [my selected extracts], https://autonomy.work/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/Autonomy-claim-the-commute-2021-v9.pdf. Hi! But New York fare evasion is mostly a bus problem: the rate on buses is 22%. On Monday, Democratic legislators pitched a new system decriminalizing fare evasion on public transit statewide, making the offense a petty misdemeanor, similar to a Makes the second point much less important, even to those minorities (those minorities are much less likely to be subject to this treatment in France versus the US). according to BSB Solicitors national survey. We are seeing more an more examples of clients being Moving the gates upstream is a consideration. Efficiency is usually both environmental and fair. Even today way too many stations on the Iida or Yonesaka lines while too few on the Kagoshima area ones, the urbanised Ou line areas or the Yosan line. In Hong Kong MTR system, with both the gated heavy rail system and open access light rail system, the operator have employed a lot of additional fare inspector at all stations, to the point multiple of them are visible at every ticket gate, trying to curb down any attempts at undermining the systems revenue, following a trend of distrust against the political stance in operation of the MTR system. Finally, as to user satisfaction, you may well be correct if youre talking of the Brits/Londoners. Menu viscount royal caravan. Right, but buses represent a small fraction of total pax, certainly in the centre but presumably more in the outer regions (where they will also be less cost-efficient). If you do Plus, there are airport surcharges. Revenue enforcement and prosecutions policy. The cost burden of commuting is unevenly and unethically distributed amongst the beneficiaries of this utility. It is still bad. (No doubt, partly econometric because of the cost-benefit calculation of replacing their antiquated coin-op turnstiles with something modern.). By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. Whats the worst that can happen with open access? The point is not to charge people to the largest amount you can, the point is to charge them the actual cost of their trip, in order to maximize global utility. DMU branch lines as political patronage are a waste! The American moral panic about fare evasion regrettably goes far beyond New York. What you want in terms of Get cars out of the city is a system where riders dont have to do math or stuff to consider whether they should take transit, As soon as you force them to calculate whether its worth it, theyll consider cars. In New York, the SBS system uses proof of payment (POP), but passengers still have to validate fares at bus stops, even if they already have paid, for example if they have a valid monthly pass. Its a valid debate to have and a valid stance to have. The most common excuse is revenue loss, which is weird since realistically New York would transition to a large discount through holding the monthly fare constant and hiking the single-ride fare. R.H August (2018), I would definitely recommend BSB Solicitors. Also, since you can technically board a tram with good intentions, if the ticket machine is full of cash already (or has a defect) you even have a good excuse. Change). What youre trying to do is persuade CASUALS that the odds of them getting caught in a random sting arent worth risking., Sure, you dont SAY that. All real growing transit cities (in Europe, North America and Asia) will (and do) eventually face capacity constraints and to solve them a lot of new concrete and tunnelling is then always necessary. A different reason to dislike monthly passes is that they work against people using bikes-walking-transit (and for that matter, cars) in different combinations. What a wonderful system! Stuff you dont have time for during the working week etc. The other point about the Asians, as I have mentioned in earlier responses on this same issue, is that the cost is very low, so they can use fancy conditions to vary the fare (on distance, time, whatever) but it will always be a travel bargain (Singapore, Hong Kong, both world cities); note also that this is not the case for their rail links to the airport where they adopt maximum extraction policies (on the basis of social justice I guess; if you can afford to fly you can afford this higher fare), such that far more Hong Kongers use buses to the airport than the airport express (though there are geographical reasons too). Everything is proof of payment. If you really think there is something really worth subsidizing in very frequent transit use, then you can make higher-order trips cheaper at various thresholds. HL February 2021, I highly recommend BSB solicitors, they are professional and responsive. At the moment that the rail industry is having a long drawn out argument on the best way forward as everyone can see the season ticket is dying but the political cost of getting rid of it is too high, so some form of fudge will be needed. Why have fare collection at all. Good lord! And Ive never seen a normal cop using a rifle. If an inspector (conductor) finds you without a ticket, you either pay a fine or get kicked off. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. The main way to encourage compliance is really to make it easier to follow the law than to break it. Sendai for instance is very much concrete before electronics/operations. Otherwise, you just get public transport as social service for people to poor to own a car rather than a general transportation service used by everybody. Counter-productive user pays econo-rat bullshit. So there is, or at least was, that kind of enforcement on this issue. My Friday train is always half as empty as any other day. Taken to court by TFL for fare evasion under contrary to byelaw 17. Mistakes happen; Ive accidentally fare-dodged in Berlin twice, only realizing the error at the end of the trip. Japan has a norm of subsidized commuting costs (mostly employer subsidized, but the amount of government subsidy increases as income increases since it comes as a tax benefit), and while its cool that people can and do commute via Shinkansen from exurbs over 100km from the city center, I dont think that is behavior the government should promote. In the east, well Hong Kong, Singapore and Japan, there is a paternalistic care about the travelling public that balances the overt greed in the west, hence Japans government-imposed ceilings on fares. Yeah, this makes sense. And I speak as a transit user. You really have no reason to be making this claim. Maybe we are cognitively disadvantaged in the West compared to East Asians, but I would instead argue that it is more likely that with modern technology varying fares dynamically by distance is very straightforward (with 1990s technology) and westerners would adapt very quickly. But fares account for the largest chunk about 38 percent (or $6.2 billion) of the MTAs annual earnings. This skewed thinking has meant that substantial financial burdens are being placed upon commuters (not to mention the public at large) whilst other beneficiaries of commuting (employers) are not contributing to its financing. This is less of an issue on Commuter systems where its mostly the trains that get crush loaded, but revenue protection is even more important for them as fare levels are higher. I would recommend them to anyone facing a similar situation. Thats Fare Evasion 101. The transit agency is not an individual who is broken by being mugged of $100; it should think in terms of its own finances, not in terms of deterrence. But this meant Caltrain (or employers) had no data on actual usage. Is there any country where ethnic minority which is poorer than rest of the population is not disproportionately inprisoned? 3) The San Francisco stations have public areas before the gates. requires time or athletics) to do? In such cities monthly passes do barely exist, and cities aim for a fair and efficient pricing system. Im not sure if there is the same DWB (Driving While Black) phenomenon? If thats something I do often, most of those will be free trips under the 45-swipe regime, regardless of whether I lose a few workdays in a given month. So you need to LOOK like youre going after the habituals. Fromstartto finish, my claim was dealt veryprofessionally. Naturally there is no algorithm or magic cost-accountancy software that can calculate those costs and benefits. Paris has one-way faregates, so half the exit space is unusable during (one-way) busy times, and the exit gates are hard to open and easy to close in order to discourage fare dodging. I am very pleased with the conclusion of my case. Also, one of the 5 key points of the Williams review into their rail system: a new commercial model: Williams argues the current franchising model has had its day and is holding the sector back, stifling collaboration, preventing the railway from operating as a cohesive network and encouraging train operators to prioritise narrow commercial interest over passengers. The turnstile acts as a reminder to everyone to pay their fare, since its not possible to fare-dodge without actively jumping it. No one asking for M16s. When I had an unlimited pass in New York, Id travel from Eastern Queens near the city limits to Manhattan for school on the weekdays, and go to Flushing on the weekends. Fare enforcement should be done with POP alone, by unarmed civilian inspectors, as in Berlin. Commuter rail is essentially PoP. Your everyone else is the minority, and just as with your earlier wrong assumption, they might be tempted by a monthly pass but under your scheme there wouldnt be any point. LegalAdviceUK exists to provide help for those in need of legal support in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. classic TOD. On the other hand, the short single trip, for a person without a monthly pass, will be unreasonably expensive, for example creating cruel incentives for poor people to walk for 25 minutes in the rain, instead of taking a bus 6 stops. That Britain thinks monthly passes are old news does not mean that they really are old news. Not being American I dont know my semi-automatic high-powered weapons at all well. Would you say that SNCF fails to provide good service to the regional cities of France? le de France Mobility wants to improve service quality, achieve greater operator responsiveness, find innovative solutions and improve passenger information. Even the fragmented British railway system is able to manage fare revenue distribution for generic tickets. Its now got the stage where in London trains are much more lightly loaded on Mondays and Fridays. Do you think the econometric, austerity-minded policies w.r.t. The flat fare is not really applicable to American cities, except possibly the Bay Area on BART. WebSo fare evasion is a civil offence not a criminal one. ERG was the company that designed HKs card (but they went bust and London managed to steal this tech for almost nothing) and were give the contract to implement a similar system for Sydney. Other examples can include travelling on a ticket which does not cover the entire journey, not tapping in or simply being without a valid ticket. Which brings us to casuals, Casual fare evasion is a thing done by normal people, regardless of age/money/class. OK, youve nit-picked one thing from that report. Subsidizing transit commutes is certainly much better than subsidizing car commutes, but the end result still seems like it could be much better if commutes were less subsidized. Yet subway fare evasion hasnt curbed despite increased policing, officials said . Its response last week to the cancellation of so many Southern trains was to issue a new timetable, removing one in six of its trains. And probably linked in to ICE. Question is not whether, its by how much. 1) Theyve got the moral compass of Donald Trump. Ridership on those marginal branch lines was cratering before.
Difference Between Public Office Information And Confidential Office Information,
How Many Stimulus Checks Have There Been In 2021,
Eric Allen Scheinbart,
Articles T